Recurring Challenges with Ledger Cold Wallets

A cryptocurrency wallet serves as a gateway to access and manage digital assets on the blockchain. Think of it as an interface that safeguards crucial private keys, granting control over one’s digital wealth on the blockchain.

Despite being labeled a “wallet,” it doesn’t physically store cryptocurrencies. Instead, it secures private keys essential for conducting cryptocurrency transactions and accessing various tools and communities. Different types of crypto wallets offer different levels of security and control.

Among them are custodial wallets, found on cryptocurrency exchanges, which manage keys on behalf of users, making account recovery easier but relinquishing full control. Software wallets, while offering user control, often store keys on internet-connected devices, exposing them to potential risks. On the flip side, hardware wallets, exemplified by Ledger, are physical devices that keep private keys offline, offering a heightened level of security.

While Ledger has long been esteemed among hardware wallet brands, recent shifts in company policies and encountered challenges suggest a potential shift in its prominent status. The latest reports reveal that the front-end of decentralized applications (DApps) utilizing Ledger’s connector, including Zapper, SushiSwap, Phantom, Balancer, and, has been compromised. Approximately three hours after identifying the security threat, Ledger confirmed the replacement of the malicious file with the authentic version around 1:35 pm UTC.

Ledger has cautioned users to consistently execute clear signing of transactions, underscoring that genuine details are exclusively presented on the Ledger device screen. Any disparity between the Ledger device screen and the computer or phone screen should prompt an immediate transaction halt.

Matthew Lilley, Chief Technical Officer at SushiSwap, was among the initial reporters of the issue, highlighting the compromise of a frequently used Web3 connector, enabling the injection of malicious code into numerous DApps. An on-chain analyst affirmed Ledger’s library confirmation of the compromise, where the vulnerable code inserted the drainer account address.

Acknowledging the vulnerability in its code, Ledger affirmed the removal of the malicious Ledger Connect Kit version, replacing it with the genuine version for deployment.

Read more from the blog


3 May 2023

StoneBlock CEO: Nervous investors will be eliminated from the market


22 Feb 2024



22 Feb 2024